4 Comments

Hi Larissa—love your coverage of the UPF topic! As someone also super interested in that space, I wanted to offer more context to the conclusion you presented here for the reader. There are 4 groups in the 'new' Hall study, 3 UPF groups varying in food that is either hyper-palatable or energy-dense, or neither. They are trying to tease out the specific contribution of these properties to caloric overconsumption.

The pre-read of the study showed no significant difference in calories consumed on the unprocessed diet vs. the ultra-processed diet which was salso not hyper-palatable and not energy-dense. This suggests that overconsumption isn't due to ultra-processing per se', but energy density and hyper palatability.

Expand full comment

Jason, great comment and thank you for pointing out that the study goes deeper than I conveyed. You're correct that Hall et al were looking into four different diets ranging in energy density and hyper palatability ranges. I've made a small update to the post to make sure folks don't miss it. (I often worry about giving too much information...maybe I shouldn't?)

Expand full comment

I suspect that folks are here because they love the weeds you dive into (that's why I'm here!), so probably more is good!

Expand full comment

Noted!!

Expand full comment